Souter’s stance for ideals
September 19, 1990
Supreme Court nominee David Souter is taking a stance that represents an American ideal, which is becoming overshadowed by the political machine.
Souter is refusing to reveal his personal feelings about controversial issues, such as abortion, during Senate confirmation hearings.
He is trying to preserve a once steadfast rule for fair trials guaranteed by the Constitution. If Souter were to give his personal opinions on controversial issues, then that would signal a willingness to base court decisions on those opinions.
The true meaning of the Supreme Court has been lost in these times of political shenanigans. It seems the only way one can get a seat on the Court is to take political stances and run an issues campaign to satisfy the public.
But Souter is not buying into those political games. He is at least attempting to look at each issue or case with an open and unprejudiced mind.
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, gave Souter the best advice of all. “Stand on your ground when you sincerely believe you are being asked for answers you cannot properly provide.”
Souter is doing just that. Whether one agrees with Souter’s nomination and his abilities is another topic that should be up to the Senate committee to decide.
Souter should be applauded for standing up against the political heat and sticking by his convictions.