It is amazing that we are all required to pass a test on the U.S. Constitution and yet many of us seem not to know what it truly means. I am referring to the incident regarding Sigma Chi’s suspension.

It seems to me that the key issue here is freedom of speech, not whether some people viewed their performance as racially or sexually derogatory. Let me refresh your memory. The first amendment states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This went into effect as far back as November 3, 1791. Let us remember that this is one of the supreme laws and rights of the land and of its people and that no fraternal conduct rules or university codes should take precedent over it.

I believe that Sigma Chi is being used as an example for all the rumored racial injustice that occurs at this university. I am not condoning prejudice or discrimination, but it is anybody’s right to have an opinion and be able to express it. I highly doubt that Sigma Chi’s intentions were to be malicious. They were merely putting on an act that was supposed to be funny. If some thought it was distasteful, they have a right to say so, or a right to leave. Sigma Chi has been unjustly accused and has been used as a scapegoat despite the right provided by the U.S. Constitution.

Kristin Semelroth

Senior

Sociology