Oil alternatives badly needed
November 17, 2005
The United States is guzzling oil faster than Tara Reid downs martinis. Now is the time to do something – not later.
In Tuesday’s Northern Star the peak oil theory was explained. The theory, in essence, explains oil production along a bell curve and says that oil is cheap and plentiful on the up curve and scarce and expensive on the down curve.
Many supporters of the peak oil theory think the United States and oil production overall is on the down curve. The theory is not without opposition. Michael Lynch, president of Global Petroleum Service Strategic Energy and Economic Research, said, “The peak oil theory is curve fitting, not science.”
This argument against the theory is irrelevant, but then again, so is the theory.
With or without the peak oil theory the fact remains clear; oil is a finite resource and it will run out eventually.
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the United States currently imports almost 60 percent of the oil it consumes. Refining capacity still has yet to recover from the natural destruction along the Gulf Coast. Yet, somehow, there are still arguments about how much oil is left to use. All the while disaster looms.
If the world’s supply of oil was depleted today, global commerce would virtually cease to exist.
The pen in your hand right now, as you read this instead of taking notes in your class, would not exist were it not for petroleum nor would it have ever made it into your hand.
Fresh tomatoes in December? It would never happen without oil and long haul truck drivers. Driving to work would be nothing more than a tale told to grandchildren over a bonfire.
The search for efficient and effective alternatives to our dependence on crude oil and its refined products must begin in earnest immediately. If, as a society, our decision is to ignore a problem that could easily be dealt with, our future may be one of uncertainty and conflict.
Resource war might become a familiar term on the evening news as nations struggle to gain control of the remaining vestiges of crude oil.
In America, oil is already called a strategic resource. We will fight for it; we have fought for it. In 1990 and 1991, the United States would not have become embroiled in conflict in Iraq had it not been for the vast oil fields of Saudi Arabia.
Weapons of mass destruction or not, the Iraq War would not have even been a consideration had it not been for its oil fields. This is why we fight wars in the Middle East and not in Rwanda or Sudan, simple economic reasons.
Resource war hell can be avoided if Americans and the rest of the world start working now to alleviate dependency on oil. Whether oil runs out tomorrow or 100 years from tomorrow is irrelevant. What is relevant is that oil will run out.
Agree? Disagree? Contact us at
www.northernstar.info.